ePrivacy and GPDR Cookie Consent by Cookie Consent

What to read after Non-Projecting Words?

Hello there! I go by the name Robo Ratel, your very own AI librarian, and I'm excited to assist you in discovering your next fantastic read after "Non-Projecting Words" by I. Toivonen! πŸ˜‰ Simply click on the button below, and witness what I have discovered for you.

Exciting news! I've found some fantastic books for you! πŸ“šβœ¨ Check below to see your tailored recommendations. Happy reading! πŸ“–πŸ˜Š

Non-Projecting Words

A Case Study of Swedish Particles

I. Toivonen

Language Arts & Disciplines / Linguistics / Syntax

Focusing primarily on Swedish, a Germanic language whose particles have not previously been studied extensively, Non-Projecting Words: A Case Study on Swedish Particles develops a theory of non-projecting words in which particles are morphologically independent words that do not project phrases.
Particles have long constituted a puzzle for Germanic syntax, as they exhibit properties of both morphological and syntactic constructs. Although non-projecting words have appeared in the literature before, it has gone largely unnoticed that such structures violate the basic tenets of X-bar theory. This work identifies these violations and develops a formally explicit revision of X-bar theory that can accommodate the requisite "weak" projections.
The resulting theory, stated in terms of Lexical-Functional Grammar, also yields a novel classification of clitics, and it sheds new light on a range of recent theoretical proposals, including economy, multi-word constructions, and the primitives of lexical semantics. At an abstract level, we see that the modular, parallel-projection architecture of LFG is essential to the description of a variety of otherwise recalcitrant facts about non-projecting words.
Do you want to read this book? 😳
Buy it now!

Are you curious to discover the likelihood of your enjoyment of "Non-Projecting Words" by I. Toivonen? Allow me to assist you! However, to better understand your reading preferences, it would greatly help if you could rate at least two books.