ePrivacy and GPDR Cookie Consent by Cookie Consent

What to read after Improving Palliative Care for Cancer?

Hello there! I go by the name Robo Ratel, your very own AI librarian, and I'm excited to assist you in discovering your next fantastic read after "Improving Palliative Care for Cancer" by Commission on Life Sciences! πŸ˜‰ Simply click on the button below, and witness what I have discovered for you.

Exciting news! I've found some fantastic books for you! πŸ“šβœ¨ Check below to see your tailored recommendations. Happy reading! πŸ“–πŸ˜Š

Improving Palliative Care for Cancer

Summary and Recommendations

Commission on Life Sciences , Institute of Medicine , National Cancer Policy Board , National Research Council

Medical / Oncology / General

It is innately human to comfort and provide care to those suffering from cancer, particularly those close to death. Yet what seems self-evident at an individual, personal level has, by and large, not guided policy at the level of institutions in this country. There is no argument that palliative care should be integrated into cancer care from diagnosis to death. But significant barriers-attitudinal, behavioral, economic, educational, and legal-still limit access to care for a large proportion of those dying from cancer, and in spite of tremendous scientific opportunities for medical progress against all the major symptoms associated with cancer and cancer death, public research institutions have not responded. In accepting a single-minded focus on research toward cure, we have inadvertently devalued the critical need to care for and support patients with advanced disease, and their families.

This report builds on and takes forward an agenda set out by the 1997 IOM report Approaching Death: Improving Care at the End of Life, which came at a time when leaders in palliative care and related fields had already begun to air issues surrounding care of the dying. That report identified significant gaps in knowledge about care at the end of life and the need for serious attention from biomedical, social science, and health services researchers. Most importantly, it recognized that the impediments to good care could be identified and potentially remedied. The report itself catalyzed further public involvement in specific initiatives-mostly pilot and demonstration projects and programs funded by the nonprofit foundation community, which are now coming to fruition.

Do you want to read this book? 😳
Buy it now!

Are you curious to discover the likelihood of your enjoyment of "Improving Palliative Care for Cancer" by Commission on Life Sciences? Allow me to assist you! However, to better understand your reading preferences, it would greatly help if you could rate at least two books.