Rate this book
What to read after Erratum to the paper “Fifty Years of Kurepa’s !n Hypothesis” by Žarko Mijajlović?
Hello there! I go by the name Robo Ratel, your very own AI librarian, and I'm excited to assist you in discovering your next fantastic read after "Erratum to the paper “Fifty Years of Kurepa’s !n Hypothesis” by Žarko Mijajlović" by Florentin Smarandache! 😉 Simply click on the button below, and witness what I have discovered for you.
Exciting news! I've found some fantastic books for you! 📚✨ Check below to see your tailored recommendations. Happy reading! 📖😊
Erratum to the paper “Fifty Years of Kurepa’s !n Hypothesis” by Žarko Mijajlović
Florentin Smarandache
In this short note we prove that the Kurepa (K) function is different from
the Smarandache-Kurepa (SK) function, therefore, these functions are not the same,
as Mijajlović has unfoundedly accused the prestigious Encyclopedia of Mathematics and
this author. This note is an answer to Mijajlović’s paper (Žarko Mijajlović, Fifty years
of Kurepa’s !n hypothesis, Bulletin T.CLIV de l’Académie serbe des sciences et des arts
– 2021 Classe des Sciences mathématiques et naturelles Sciences mathématiques, No. 46,
169–181 (2021).
Do you want to read this book? 😳
Buy it now!
Are you curious to discover the likelihood of your enjoyment of "Erratum to the paper “Fifty Years of Kurepa’s !n Hypothesis” by Žarko Mijajlović" by Florentin Smarandache? Allow me to assist you! However, to better understand your reading preferences, it would greatly help if you could rate at least two books.
